2% The Two Percent Company
[ - ]
| Large Type Edition |
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Navigate the Rants




Categories

Special Collections
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Recent Comments
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
|
Subscribe to the
2%Co Rants:



Syndicate this site:
ATOM
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
| The Usual Suspects

Carnivals
Carnival of the Godless
Skeptics' Circle
Tangled Bank

Gone But Not Forgotten
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Archives (Weekly)
% 2008.12.21 » 2008.12.27
% 2008.11.16 » 2008.11.22
% 2008.11.09 » 2008.11.15
% 2008.11.02 » 2008.11.08
% 2008.10.05 » 2008.10.11
% 2008.09.28 » 2008.10.04
% 2008.09.14 » 2008.09.20
% 2008.08.31 » 2008.09.06
% 2008.07.06 » 2008.07.12
% 2008.06.22 » 2008.06.28
% 2008.04.13 » 2008.04.19
% 2008.01.20 » 2008.01.26


Archives (Monthly)
% 2008 December
% 2008 November
% 2008 October
% 2008 September
% 2008 July
% 2008 June
% 2008 April
% 2008 January
% 2007 November
% 2007 October
% 2007 August
% 2007 July
% 2007 June
% 2007 May
% 2007 April
% 2007 March
% 2007 February
% 2007 January
% 2006 December
% 2006 November
% 2006 October
% 2006 September
% 2006 August
% 2006 July
% 2006 June
% 2006 May
% 2006 April
% 2006 March
% 2006 February
% 2006 January
% 2005 December
% 2005 November
% 2005 October
% 2005 September
% 2005 August
% 2005 July
% 2005 June
% 2005 May
% 2005 April
% 2005 March
% 2005 February
% 2005 January
% 2004 December
% 2004 November
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
| The Two Percent Company's Rants

...forging the unknown into common knowledge, eradicating bullshit and ignorance, and fighting for truth, justice, and the use of science, reason and logic to further the progress of humankind.

— • —

We Love Christmas...Now Let's Play Cards
2008.12.24 (Wed) 12:30

Who's waging the legendary and infamous War on Christmas?

It's a question we've always wanted to hear a legitimate answer to.

Presumably, it wouldn't be the Christians. Right? You know, since it celebrates the birth of their own personal superhero and all (whether or not they got it right).

Would it be Jews? Doubtful. They've got enough troubles of their own, and there are plenty of secular Jews who set up a Chanukah Bush to commemorate the occasion. The rest of the Jews are normally content to live and let live, or (in the case of some of the more fundy types) tend to completely ignore the silly habits of silly religions (as they're too busy indulging in the silly habits of their own silly religion).

How about pagans? After all, the holiday was ostensibly stolen from them (at least, the real ones, not the ones who play at being pagans since black turtlenecks passed out of style in the fifties). They've been celebrating the Winter Solstice since a few millennia before Jesus was born; the choice of a date for Christmas is just another in a long line of religious elements that Christianity "borrowed" from prior traditions. But those wacky pagans tend toward pacifism, and typically won't do much beyond snorting at Christian hubris over their Grande Half-Caf Mocha Lattes.

Hindus? Muslims? Shintoists? Scientologists? Who the fuck is waging the War on Christmas?

No...it couldn't be. Could it? Is it...

...atheists?

Bzzzzzzzzzzzt! No, sorry, thanks for playing. And that's where the Christians — by which, of course, we mean the scary bigoted ones — have gone off the fucking deep end yet again, because it's already gone far beyond fucking outrageously silly that the religious majority in this country feels the need to play the martyr every fucking winter. Then again, this is nothing new, and nothing unique — humans have a natural predilection to "root for the underdog," and even when we're on top, we like to paint a very different picture...a picture of our valiant struggle against insurmountable odds and the smirking faces of adversity and whichever group we feel is pissing us off. Just ask "mavericks" like John McCain.

It's no surprise when people pretend they're the Noble Hero fighting a Big Bad Villain. It's even less of a surprise when it turns out — as it so often does, in that nasty "real world" we all have to deal with — that they're actually the Big Bad Villain, after all. It's ingrained in our psyches, this admiration and profound respect we all feel towards the plucky rebel, whether he's a farmboy with untapped potential, or a scoundrel with a heart of gold. Ask seven out of ten Americans whether George Dubya Bush reminds them more of Luke Skywalker or Darth Vader, and they'll point out that he hangs around an awful lot with Emperor Palpatine. Ask George himself, though, and he'll doubtless tell you his lightsaber doesn't run red.

But myth is myth, and reality is reality. And the reality is this: when so many members of your group hold so much goddamn power and authority over Western civilization, you can hardly cry "Oppression!" at the drop of a hat. And, let's face it, silly Christians, your tears are on a hair-trigger these days.

Are atheists trying to destroy Christmas? Well, we can't speak for all atheists, since we still steadfastly believe that "grouping" atheists is an exercise in futility comparable to mopping the ocean, but we'd have to offer a resounding "No," kids. If for no other reason than the simple retort: Why would we want to?

Seriously — we love Christmas. It's a nice break from a cold, dark winter; it's a nice breather as we head into a new year full of new possibilities (as arbitrary as our calendars may be on a cosmic scale, we're still as susceptible to civilized psychological conditioning as the next guy, and a new year does mean something on a visceral level). But best of all, Christmas is some "universal" time off, since the date has been recognized as a government (and therefore secular) holiday. That means we can get together with everybody we care about, friends and family and all the ones we love, and spend time together, eating, partying, playing, traveling, giving and receiving gifts, and just generally enjoying the heck out of the fact that we've got people whom we care a fuck of a lot about, who care a fuck of a lot about us. And as tiny monkey-type creatures on an insignificant speck in an out-of-the-way corner of a pretty gargantuan universe, what could really matter more than that?

We adore Christmas for what it is — this great time with great people — and we similarly adore the season for all the things it traditionally brings: beautifully decorated houses and trees, gifts wrapped in shiny paper and bows, mistletoe, stockings, and the ubiquitous incessantly grinning fat hobo in a red suit who haunts every shopping mall and television show. Is it crass and commercial? Sure; but it's also warm and comforting.

It just hasn't been a full year until we've watched the Grinch steal Christmas and Charlie Brown salvage it; until we've caught bits and pieces, all out of order, of the twenty-four hour A Christmas Story marathon; until we've drunk more egg nog and hot scotch than the Surgeon General would strictly approve of; until we've put colored lights everywhere an extension cord will reach; until we've loaded up the MP3 player with a hundred songs by Bing and Frank, Andy and Johnny (though honestly, who tells "scary ghost stories" on Christmas?), Ella Fitzgerald and Bobby Helms, Brenda Lee and Eartha Kitt, the Beach Boys, the Waitresses (come on, you know you listen to that one too), and, of course, the incredible Vince Guaraldi. (Just put the entire Peanuts Christmas album on repeat and melt into the perfection.) Hell, the Christmas season even marks the full-force return of Mallomars (the world's perfect cookie) to supermarket shelves.

If you haven't quite worked it out yet: we love Christmas.

So why the hell would we want to destroy it?

The simple fact is that we're not destroying Christmas, but we're doing something that the Christian bigots hate far, far worse: we're enjoying it. And that's just not fair, because they don't like to share. That would be too...well, "Christian" of them, ironically.

So what do they do? They try to take it back. You'll notice that reports of the "War on Christmas" are frequently followed by exhortations to somehow "take it back." Which is why you get blowhard assholes like Bill O'Reilly frothing up, making up lies to rally his moronic flock to the cause, and taking the opportunity to throw some more bullshit accusations at any non-believers. Because we eat babies and we strangle our grandmas and we're clearly out to stop Christmas.

Except we're not. All we want, just like the Christians, is to celebrate Christmas in our own way. Without all the silly mythology and praying and super-fairy-man stories that they think are necessary elements of the celebrations.

We have a simple analogy for what's happened here.

In essence, various ancient civilizations independently invented the deck of playing cards, and each created a game to go with it: Go Fish, Crazy Eights, Hearts, Whist, and so on.

The Christians took what they wanted from each game, and started playing Gin with their cards.

Modern, rational, sensible, secular folks looked at playing cards, and realized what a great game Texas Hold 'Em might be. And we started playing.

The Christians? They're pissed. And they say we can't play their game with their cards.

But it's out of their hands, because we're not playing the game they invented, and we're not playing with their cards. Like everybody, we're just playing a game we enjoy with the cards we've got.

And that's Christmas (and, in a way, life). They can pretend it's whatever they like — they can play Gin for eternity — as long as they leave us to our Poker. Which isn't a bad way to pass Christmas Eve, come to think of it.

So, most sincerely: however you celebrate Christmas, or even if you don't — enjoy the season. It's a great time to feel good about being a sentient, loving, caring being, surrounded by others with similar thoughts and feelings.

And, well, come on: Vince Guaraldi. You just can't beat that.

Merry Christmas, everybody! We'll see you in the New Year....

O, Tannenbaum


[  Filed under: % Religion  % Two Percent Company  ]
% Permalink   % Comments [4]   % TrackBack [0]   % Pop-Up Rant

-----


No, Dude, We've Been Hitting Snooze for a Year Now
2008.11.19 (Wed) 19:07
Hit the snooze again

Wow — four years of Two Percent.

Or, well, technically, about two and a half years over the span of four. Which isn't terrible.

We'd love to mark the occasion with some fanfare, some self-congratulatory bullshit, and a wonderful thread where all our regulars drop by to say "Dudes, happy birthday, Allison still really sucks, Bill Napoli's an asshat, Tom Carder's still scary-looking, and...wait, whatever happened to Safari Tom?"

But you know what we're going to do instead? We're going to throw up this quick little declaration of the completion of four years, and we're going to do our best to stop hitting the snooze button on our Rant alarm.

See, four years ago, we started this whole thing because we kept writing to each other about the crazy shit going on around us. We were reading some wonderful bloggers, like Les Jenkins and PZ Myers, Brent Rasmussen and Ed Brayton. We saw so much bullshit out there, and privately Ranted about it...and then we realized: stop wasting time Ranting to each other, and get some material up for others to read. It became a sort of mantra: don't tell me, man — Rant it!

The incredibly nuts past two years have been...well, there isn't a much more apt description than incredibly nuts. And while "apologizing" isn't the right thing to do — you guys don't pay us for this stuff (or, if you have, we still haven't received the checks) — we do wish we had more time for Two Percent stuff.

So here's the deal: with no guarantees (as usual), we're going to try our best to kick our own (and each other's) asses, and get some more Rants up on at least a slightly more frequent schedule. The last few months have seen an up-tick in Rants, and we're going to try to keep that up, and maybe even build on it. We've still got real life shoving red hot pokers up our asses — more offspring are imminent, some great professional developments are demanding a lot of attention, and the usual mish-mash of pesky real life stuff is knocking on our doors every hour of every day. Every so often, we even need to eat and sleep.

But — and here's the kicker — we still find the time to write each other to say: "Dude, did you see this bullshit?"

So it's time to get back to our original Two Percent mantra: Don't tell me, man — Rant it!

Let's see what we can do. And thanks for sticking around — as Heisenberg could attest, this site wouldn't be the same without you reading it.


[  Filed under: % Two Percent Company  % Two Percent Toons  ]
% Permalink   % Comments [19]   % TrackBack [0]   % Pop-Up Rant

-----


Fuck the Big Three
2008.11.19 (Wed) 13:32

Why...

...the fuck...

...should we even be considering...

...bailing out the "Big Three" US automakers?

It's bad enough that we had to bail out the entire financial industry, but, in fairness, the argument there was a little more compelling. That debacle, brought to us by the fine folks who, well, bring us debacles, impacted every citizen in this country, and in many cases, we had no real alternatives. We can also see the case for bailing out airlines — yes, it's a bit of a pain, and the rank incompetence of the air travel corporations is growing beyond atrocious, but we do see the public, national interest in maintaining easy access to domestic air travel (the asshats at the TSA notwithstanding).

But domestic auto makers? Fuck 'em. There are plenty of non-domestic alternatives. Just look around next time you drive, and we're sure you'll see tons of them on the road. The US manufacturers have been rolling out Pieces of Shit for decades. It isn't the economic downturn that struck their death blow (though it certainly hit them about the head and neck with a sock full of quarters), it's their simple inability to compete in a global market. These bloated behemoths were all too happy rolling out environmentally bulimic trucks and SUVs while things were good — when the only people asking for better fuel economy are all penniless hippies, why should commercial capitalism give a shit what they buy?

But now that the price of fuel has gone up and the economy has gone down, these fuckers have suddenly seen the light? It took a look at the bottom line, as the desire for better fuel economy spread like a green fungus across nearly every possible demographic, for them to finally decide that they need to retool and invest in more fuel efficient cars?

Fuck 'em — they knew it was coming years ago, and they did nothing. They knew the gravy train was truly over just a few years back, and they continued to manufacture cars that no one wanted to buy. So let 'em die.

Oh, but what about the 300,000 people they employ? Gee, folks — Walmart employs over one million people. If the plight of the economy hits the bulk retailers, should we bail them out as well? Because their collapse would put four to eight times as many Americans out of work as would the collapse of all three big US auto makers put together.

And we don't want to hear that one in twelve US jobs relies on these three companies. If you want to make that claim, Big Three, then you'll need to show your work, because we call bullshit. And before you try throwing in a few variables on which we'll also call bullshit, remember that a professional mechanic, with a quick refresher, can work on Hondas as easily as F-150s — so that doesn't count.

So we're waiting to hear: what exactly is the overwhelmingly compelling downside of these three companies going under?

Sure, it would be another kick in the shriveled nuts to our feebly stumbling economy, but compared to what we've already been through, it would be a drop in the bucket. And we have plenty of other cars to buy (fuck, we've been buying them for years already), which wouldn't devastate our economy any more than it is already devastated.

Here's an easy question: You know what isn't good for the economy? Repeatedly propping up a failing industry in which we cannot compete in a global market. What we're doing, basically, is using taxpayer money to buy into a business model that just isn't working. Further, the auto makers have shown us no compelling reasons why their business models — whatever they are — will start working at any time in the near future. Why should we perpetuate this farce? Don't get us wrong, it wouldn't be any kind of instant economic curative if we didn't throw our money at this problem, but in our opinion, it just isn't worth it to bail out these asshats again and again when they've shown that they have no ability to upgrade or revise (or, in an ideal world, change) their business models to compete with the rest of the world.

Just over a month ago, we bailed out the auto makers with $25 billion in loans aimed at making more fuel-efficient cars to be issued in 2009. Now the auto makers are looking for that same amount of money...but this time, those clever fuckholes would like a "no strings" handout.

How about: no. How about: more fuel efficient cars are the only things that we, as taxpayers, have a vested national interest in providing incentives for (financial or otherwise). How about: if that's not what you want to use the money for, then you don't fucking get any.

Here's a fucking thought: there are other ways to get a capital infusion if you need one. How about selling assets? Or phasing out some advertising spending? (Because these days, of course, everybody buys automobiles because of the grinning celebrity behind the wheel of a sedan on TV or on a billboard. Right, morons?) Of course, if you're in real trouble, you could always declare bankruptcy — it doesn't necessarily mean the end of the world, or the company (at least, it doesn't have to in every case). Have the Big Three tried investigating any of these avenues before looking for a handout? Fuck, no!

Without even looking, we can virtually guarantee that there are assets that could be sold (corporate jets, anyone?). And the last time we watched television, we're pretty sure we fast-forwarded past at least a dozen commercials for domestic cars. (Hey, Chevy? You guys are the carriers of the "Importitis" virus, so shut the fuck up.) Hell, you could always drop some of your fabulously expensive Nascar sponsorships before asking for our fucking taxpayer money, dickholes. Is that fourteen drivers there on Team Chevy's site alone?

And yes, we know that you don't want to do any of those things. But guess what? We don't want to bail your sorry asses out again! You know the saying that tough times call for tough measures? That means tough measures by you, not us.

You know, maybe after these three lumbering prehistoric giants are gone, some of the barriers that block start-up auto companies from entering the market will be removed. Maybe we'll get some true innovation again, a reinvention of the industry on the level of Ford's assembly line. Maybe we'll see a manufacturing company that doesn't rely on inefficient, overpriced union labor, and incompetent, short-sighted management, and maybe we'll once again have a shot at a place of prominence in the auto making industry, if that means anything. But writing a blank fucking check to these three fucks, so they can live high for another few months or years while refusing to cash the one check they need — a reality check — isn't going to get us anywhere.

So, hey: Big Three! Tighten your fucking belts, and try to finally change your business models so that you can fucking compete with the foreign auto makers. If it's finally, truly too late, and you can't do that, then shut up and die. We don't need your sorry asses, and we sure as shit don't need to fund them.


[  Filed under: % Business & the Economy  % Government & Politics  ]
% Permalink   % Comments [12]   % TrackBack [0]   % Pop-Up Rant

-----


Yeah, Well, My Imaginary Friend Just Beat Up Your Imaginary Friend!
2008.11.11 (Tue) 15:15

Ah, the sound of children bickering. Only these aren't children. Well, not literally, anyway.

Holocaust survivors said Monday they are through trying to negotiate with the Mormon church over posthumous baptisms of Jews killed in Nazi concentration camps, saying the church has repeatedly violated a 13-year-old agreement barring the practice.

...

Baptism by proxy allows faithful Mormons to have their ancestors baptized into the 178-year-old church, which they believe reunites families in the afterlife.

Using genealogy records, the church also baptizes people who have died from all over the world and from different religions. Mormons stand in as proxies for the person being baptized and immerse themselves in a baptismal pool.

...

"We don't think any faith group has the right to ask another to change its doctrines," Wickman said. "If our work for the dead is properly understood ... it should not be a source of friction to anyone. It's merely a freewill offering."

Wow. Let's count the layers of nonsense here. First, religion itself is nonsensical, so the baptisms performed by the Mormons on live people are just silly. On top of that, their practice of baptism-by-proxy of dead people who have never indicated their desire to be baptized as Mormons is even more silly. Then there's the absurd little nugget that the Jews involved are offended by these silly, silly fake ceremonies that have no impact on anyone anyway, which is even more silly. Finally, the offense that the Mormons are taking at the perceived request to change their practices tops the silliness cake off quite nicely. Anyone got some candles? Not that we want to blow them out, mind you — we'd just like to set fire to the whole affair.

Folks, both of these belief systems are just plain nonsensical from a rational standpoint, whether you indulge in them or not. What the fuck does it matter if some other group of silly people pretends to posthumously induct your silly people into their silly club? Seriously, who gives a fuck? What, are these already-dead Jews going to be sitting on a cloud in Jewish Heaven, enjoying the afterlife, when all of a sudden the Cruise Director of Jewish Heaven flies over on little angel wings, scans a clipboard containing the monthly Mormon data, and pipes up:

"Hey, Irv, sorry — it says here that you're a Mormon now. Grab your stuff and head over to Mormon Heaven — but you can leave your yarmulke...they'll be providing magic underwear when you get there."

Not too astoundingly, of course, our silly argument holds more water than the actual silly argument put forth:

Michel suggested that posthumous baptisms of Holocaust victims play into the hands of Holocaust deniers.

"They tell me, that my parents' Jewishness has not been altered but ... 100 years from now, how will they be able to guarantee that my mother and father of blessed memory who lived as Jews and were slaughtered by Hitler for no other reason than they were Jews, will someday not be identified as Mormon victims of the Holocaust?" Michel said Monday.

Gee, Mr. Michel, how can we guarantee that this little exercise in idiocy won't change the historical record? Are you fucking kidding us? Fuck, what the hell does a little Mormon spreadsheet matter to anybody except the fucking Mormons? They're not exactly going to be the definitive keepers of history a few hundred years from now. Let's face it: these are people who have decided that, historically speaking, a Middle Eastern Jew from two millennia ago was wandering around North America, the Native Americans are a lost Jewish tribe, and Joseph Smith saw fucking angels (and, after losing the first transcriptions of his divine revelation, "read" a "different" version that was also totally, completely, for-real the God's-honest truth, no really, even if it's a little bit slightly different this time, I swear!). For fuck's sake, does anyone really believe that their little Microsoft Excel file of posthumously converted Mormon Jews is going to replace the actual history books? Even if they put in some devastatingly cool macros? (Is ƒx=MORMONIZE(J1,J6000000) a valid function?) The only people who take the Mormons seriously are the Mormons. And, frankly, we're not entirely sure they do. (Seriously...magic underwear?)

We really should just point out that this fucking insidiously asinine crap merely punches up yet again that any one religion is stupid enough...but the fact that there are so many of these silly mythologies, all utterly contradicting each other, is just further evidence of the stupidity of it all. Especially given the bullshit these assfucks pull on each other. The only saving grace is that, while they're focused on their petty religioso squabbles, maybe their efforts to push their beliefs as law will fall by the wayside.

With all this outrage from Jews over the Johnny-come-lately conversions of dead Jews to Mormonism, how come they've never been particularly pissed about the entire Christian fairy tale being based on the conversion of one dead Jew to the Granddaddy of all Christianity? Obviously, we don't think they should be, but a little consistency in their internal logic would be nice. For a change. Fuck, man.

And just when you think the silliness can't be laid on any thicker, the last sentence of the article takes it to new and dizzying heights:

In May, the Vatican ordered Catholic dioceses worldwide to withhold member registries from Mormons so that Catholics could not be baptized.

Whew! Thank fucking Christ they dodged that bullet. After all, Catholic angels are former nuns — they don't just escort you out of heaven, they kick your ass on the way out the door.


[  Filed under: % Religion  ]
% Permalink   % Comments [19]   % TrackBack [0]   % Pop-Up Rant

-----